From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Elec. Express

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 10, 2021
20-CV-9077 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-9077 (JGK)

08-10-2021

JOSUE ROMERO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ELECTRONIC EXPRESS, INC. Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge.

It having been reported to this Court that the parties have settled this action, it is, on this 10th day of August, 2021, hereby ordered that this matter be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 30 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

All pending motions are dismissed as moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romero v. Elec. Express

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 10, 2021
20-CV-9077 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Romero v. Elec. Express

Case Details

Full title:JOSUE ROMERO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 10, 2021

Citations

20-CV-9077 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2021)