From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 18, 2012
93 So. 3d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2D11–5123.

2012-07-18

Erik ROMERHAUS, Appellant, v. Julia ROMERHAUS, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christine K. Vogel, Acting Circuit Judge. Erik Romerhaus, pro se. No appearance for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christine K. Vogel, Acting Circuit Judge.
Erik Romerhaus, pro se. No appearance for Appellee.
MORRIS, Judge.

Erik Romerhaus appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion to affirm expiration of a domestic violence injunction. We affirm but write to point out that the injunction expired on its own terms on February 14, 2007. To the extent that Romerhaus claims that the notification requirements of section 741.30(8)(c)(5), Florida Statutes (2006), were not followed, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right he may have to seek mandamus relief in the circuit court. See City of Tarpon Springs v. Planes, 30 So.3d 693, 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that mandamus may be employed to require a governmental entity to perform a ministerial duty that is expressly imposed by law).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 18, 2012
93 So. 3d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Romerhaus v. Romerhaus

Case Details

Full title:Erik ROMERHAUS, Appellant, v. Julia ROMERHAUS, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

93 So. 3d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)