From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romeo v. John E. Andrus Memorial, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 4, 2010
07 CV 2863 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2010)

Opinion

07 CV 2863 (KMK).

March 4, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On January 2, 2008, Magistrate Judge Smith entered a Report Recommendation ("R R") recommending that this Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (R R (Dkt. No. 25) 5.) In the R R, Magistrate Judge Smith provides notice that objections to her conclusions were due within thirteen working days. ( Id. at 6.) In the spirit of understatement, the Court notes that this period has expired.

When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R R on a dispositive motion for clear error. See Eisenberg v. New England Motor Freight, Inc., 564 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The Court has reviewed the R R and finds no error, clear or otherwise. The Court therefore adopts the R R in its entirety, and it is

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is requested to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romeo v. John E. Andrus Memorial, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 4, 2010
07 CV 2863 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Romeo v. John E. Andrus Memorial, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RALPH ROMEO and KIRA MILO, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN E. ANDRUS MEMORIAL, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 4, 2010

Citations

07 CV 2863 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2010)