From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romans v. Haymes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 3, 1996
676 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2083.

July 3, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Philip Bloom and Margarita Esquiroz, JJ.

Peter Ticktin, Boca Raton, for appellants.

Bush Derr, Kenneth L. Baker and K. Stuart Goldberg, Orlando; De La Cruz Cutler, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.


In the underlying suit for legal malpractice, we find that the trial court erred by granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment and by denying the plaintiffs' motion for rehearing where the defendants, as the movants on the motion for summary judgment, failed to meet their burden of showing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510 (c); Morgan v. Growers Mktg. Serv., Inc., 370 So.2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). A review of the record shows that a genuine issue of material fact remained as to whether Dr. Pullias, one of the physicians that fell below the standard of care, was employed by HIP Network of Florida, Inc. thereby creating the possibility of liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

Romans v. Haymes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 3, 1996
676 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Romans v. Haymes

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. ROMANS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 3, 1996

Citations

676 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)