From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romanes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 27, 2013
CASE NO.: SC13-1225 (Fla. Sep. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC13-1225 Lower Tribunal No.: 2D12-4093 Lower Tribunal No.: 95-CF-4837

09-27-2013

DELIO ROMANES Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Court
kb
Served:
DELIO ROMANES
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
HON. JAMES R. BIRKHOLD, CLERK
HON. PAT FRANK, CLERK


Summaries of

Romanes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 27, 2013
CASE NO.: SC13-1225 (Fla. Sep. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Romanes v. State

Case Details

Full title:DELIO ROMANES Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: SC13-1225 (Fla. Sep. 27, 2013)