From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romancorrea v. Superior Court of Cal.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 4, 2023
1:20-cv-00242-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00242-JLT-HBK (PC)

01-04-2023

ANTONIO ROMANCORREA, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; FNU SULLIVAN, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 22)

The magistrate judge issued a findings and recommendations recommending that the district court dismiss Plaintiff's second amended complaint, arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, because it fails to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) The findings and recommendations notified the parties that any objections to were due within fourteen days. (Id. at 1, 8.) Plaintiff did not file any objections and the time to do so has expired. (See docket.)

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 22, 2022 (Doc. 2) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The Clerk of Court shall terminate any pending motions, close this case, and enter judgment against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romancorrea v. Superior Court of Cal.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 4, 2023
1:20-cv-00242-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Romancorrea v. Superior Court of Cal.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO ROMANCORREA, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00242-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2023)