From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

March, 1928.


Order reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion for alimony, counsel fee, etc., denied without prejudice, without costs. The record herein does not show reasonable probability that the plaintiff will prevail upon the trial and, therefore, the granting of temporary alimony, counsel fee, etc., was improper. ( De Vide v. De Vide, 186 App. Div. 814.) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Case Details

Full title:ROSE ROLNICK, Respondent, v. HYMAN ROLNICK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Villasenor v. Villasenor

"The law is settled in this State beyond dispute that a wife may not recover alimony pending the suit, or…