From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rollins v. Hart Sec. Ltd.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 28, 2016
NO. 02-14-00405-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 28, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-14-00405-CV

01-28-2016

MARK ROLLINS APPELLANT v. HART SECURITY LTD. APPELLEE


FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 141-274465-14 MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's "Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, MEIER, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: January 28, 2016

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Rollins v. Hart Sec. Ltd.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 28, 2016
NO. 02-14-00405-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Rollins v. Hart Sec. Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:MARK ROLLINS APPELLANT v. HART SECURITY LTD. APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 28, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-14-00405-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 28, 2016)