From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roller v. Chrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 21, 1999
459 Mich. 969 (Mich. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 112286, 112290.

April 21, 1999.


Summary Disposition April 21, 1999:

In lieu of granting the applications for leave to appeal, that part of the Court of Appeals judgment remanding the case for a new trial is vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp, 228 Mich. App. 486 (1998). MCR 7.302(F)(1). In the event the Court concludes that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the parol evidence, it shall remand the case to the circuit court for a new trial. If the Court determines that the trial court properly admitted the evidence, it shall remand the case to the circuit court for a determination whether, as a matter of law, ambiguity exists in the stock option agreements. If the circuit court determines that ambiguity exists, the judgment shall be reinstated. Jurisdiction is not retained. Court of Appeals No. 194756.


We concur in this disposition but would imply no view as to the validity of UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.


Summaries of

Roller v. Chrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 21, 1999
459 Mich. 969 (Mich. 1999)
Case details for

Roller v. Chrysler Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROLLER v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 21, 1999

Citations

459 Mich. 969 (Mich. 1999)
593 N.W.2d 548