From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roller v. Buchheit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 31, 1999
259 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 31, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Dismiss Pleading.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) (see, Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87-88; Grossman v. Pharmhouse Corp., 234 A.D.2d 918, 919; Unadilla Silo Co. v. Ernst Young, 234 A.D.2d 754). Each of the causes of action in' the amended complaint states a cognizable claim for declaratory or monetary relief based on theories of unconscionability or breach of contract (see, Grossman v. Pharmhouse Corp., supra, at 919; Master Lease Corp. v. Manhattan Limousine, 177 A.D.2d 85, 88-89, lv dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 893).

Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Callahan, JJ.


Summaries of

Roller v. Buchheit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 31, 1999
259 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Roller v. Buchheit

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. ROLLER et al., Respondents, v. GERALD A. BUCHHEIT, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 883