From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolle v. A. Birken

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 9, 2008
994 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

granting mandamus to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure as to the setting of a trial date

Summary of this case from SR Acquisitions—Florida City, LLC v. San Remo Homes at Florida City, LLC

Opinion

No. 3D07-2579.

January 9, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Genden, J.

Sheldon J. Schlesinger and Scott M. Newmark, Fort Lauderdale; Burlington Rockenbach and Philip M. Burlington, West Palm Beach; Michael B. Solomon, North Miami, for petitioners.

Abadin, Jaramillo, Cook, Heffernan Martinez and Kimberly A. Cook; Miami Dade County Attorney's Office and Eric K. Gressman; Sean A. Moughan, Fort Lauderdale; Stephens, Lynn, Klein, Lacava, Hoffman and Puya and Roberta G. Mandel, Miami and Jonathon P. Lynn, Fort Lauderdale; Kubicki Draper and Daniel Draper, Miami; Bunnell, Woulfe, Kirschbaum, Keller, McIntyre Gregorie and Richard T. Woulfe, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

Before CORTIÑAS and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set this case for trial. The parties do not dispute that the case is "at issue," as contemplated by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440, and that several notices for trial informed the court of such. Nevertheless, the trial court has refused to set a trial date because discovery is not yet completed and because internal court procedures presumably do not allow a case to be set for trial in the backup division, where longer trials such as this one are tried, without the completion of a certificate of readiness for trial by all parties. We have jurisdiction, grant the petition and issue the writ.

Once a case is procedurally at issue and upon the filing of a proper notice for trial, the court must act upon the notice within a reasonable time and give the parties a trial date. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.440(a); Garcia v. Lincare Inc., 906 So.2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Ivans v. Greenbaum, 613 So.2d 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Kubera v. Fisher, 483 So.2d 836, 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Accordingly, the application for writ of mandamus is granted. See id. Internal operating procedures of the court must give way to the rules of procedure promulgated by the Florida Supreme Court.

The trial judge is directed forthwith to set this case for trial on a date no more than one-hundred and twenty days from this date, and thereafter to proceed to a conclusion of the case in the ordinary course.

Mandamus granted.


Summaries of

Rolle v. A. Birken

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 9, 2008
994 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

granting mandamus to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure as to the setting of a trial date

Summary of this case from SR Acquisitions—Florida City, LLC v. San Remo Homes at Florida City, LLC
Case details for

Rolle v. A. Birken

Case Details

Full title:Shaniah ROLLE, a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 9, 2008

Citations

994 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

SR Acquisitions—Florida City, LLC v. San Remo Homes at Florida City, LLC

A trial court has broad discretion to manage its docket, but must do so within the confines of governing…