From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roland-Austin Tan v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 15, 2024
2:24-cv-02835-FMO-MAR (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-02835-FMO-MAR

07-15-2024

ROLAND-AUSTIN TAN Plaintiffs, v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Roland-Austin Tan v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 15, 2024
2:24-cv-02835-FMO-MAR (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Roland-Austin Tan v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:ROLAND-AUSTIN TAN Plaintiffs, v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-02835-FMO-MAR (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2024)