From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 17, 2024
3:24-CV-04075-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CV-04075-LJC

07-17-2024

CESAR A. ROJAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PERMANENT RESTRAINING ORDER

Hon. Lisa J. Cisneros, United States Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the Court on the United States' Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Motion for Permanent Restraining Order. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The United States' motion is hereby GRANTED in part;
2. The Court will extend the time for the United States to respond to the Motion for Permanent Restraining Order to August 9, 2024. The Court will allow Plaintiff Greysa Ramirez the opportunity to respond to the United States' request to extend the response deadline to September 9, 2024. Ramirez's response/opposition is due no later than July 26, 2024. After the deadline for Ramirez's response/opposition, the Court will consider whether to further extend the deadline for the United States to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Permanent Restraining Order to September 9, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rojas v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 17, 2024
3:24-CV-04075-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Rojas v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CESAR A. ROJAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 17, 2024

Citations

3:24-CV-04075-LJC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)