From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. Provident Sav. Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. EDCV 11-01247 VAP (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 11-01247 VAP (SPx)

10-05-2011

ELIZABETH ROJAS, EDUARDO ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB, GARRI NICKEL, LAW OFFICE OF KIMBALL TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP; DANIELLE T KUSSLET, SBN 180144; SHELLEY M. CRAWFORD, BAR #219957; ALL PARTIES OF INTERESTED, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Order filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Complaint against Provident Savings Bank, FSB, and Garri Nickel is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered.

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rojas v. Provident Sav. Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. EDCV 11-01247 VAP (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Rojas v. Provident Sav. Bank

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH ROJAS, EDUARDO ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. EDCV 11-01247 VAP (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)