Opinion
No. 2: 13-cv-0850 KJN P
06-25-2013
ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. NORTH KERN STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.
ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2013, new case documents served on plaintiff were returned unserved. The envelope was marked "paroled." It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
Accordingly, on June 14, 2013, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. On June 20, 2013, the June 14, 2013 order was returned unserved with the envelope marked "paroled."
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
________________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE