From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. Cnty. of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2022
22-cv-1104 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-1104 TLN CKD P

09-22-2022

ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 11, 2022, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Rojas v. Cnty. of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2022
22-cv-1104 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Rojas v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 22, 2022

Citations

22-cv-1104 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2022)