From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Stedman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 14, 2003
No. 03-03-00378-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00378-CV

Filed: August 14, 2003

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, No. 20606, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Patterson


MEMORANDUM OPINION


After filing a notice of appeal, appellant Pamela M. Rogers has failed to file a clerk's record or a reporter's record. Appellant failed to file the requisite filling fee. Her counsel filed a motion to withdraw, and the Court allowed him to withdraw. On July 25, 2003, the Clerk of this Court sent written notice to appellant that if she did not designate, pay for and file a clerk's record, or otherwise respond to the Court, by August 5, the cause would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant has failed to respond.

Consequently, this appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b) and (c).


Summaries of

Rogers v. Stedman

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 14, 2003
No. 03-03-00378-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2003)
Case details for

Rogers v. Stedman

Case Details

Full title:Pamela M. Rogers, Appellant v. Horis Stedman, M.D., Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 14, 2003

Citations

No. 03-03-00378-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2003)