From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 6, 1916
155 P. 1150 (Okla. Crim. App. 1916)

Opinion

No. A-2525.

Opinion Filed May 6, 1916.

Appeal from County Court, Pontotoc County; I.M. King, Judge.

Jim Rogers, convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law appeals. Affirmed.

Roddie Roland, for plaintiff in error.

R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers, was convicted on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and to be confined in the county jail for thirty days.

The evidence for the state tended to show that Jim Rogers sold a pint of alcohol to T.E. Moore.

As a witness in his own behalf plaintiff in error, Jim Rogers denied making the sale. The issue was clearly one of fact for the jury to determine. The record presents no question of law for the determination of this court. It follows that the conviction should be affirmed. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 6, 1916
155 P. 1150 (Okla. Crim. App. 1916)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:JIM ROGERS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: May 6, 1916

Citations

155 P. 1150 (Okla. Crim. App. 1916)
155 P. 1150