From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 17, 2022
2022 N.D. 50 (N.D. 2022)

Opinion

20210260

03-17-2022

Mark Allen Rogers, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Christopher W. Nelson, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, ND, for respondent and appellee.


Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Christopher W. Nelson, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, ND, for respondent and appellee.

PER CURIAM

[¶1] Mark Allen Rogers appeals from a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Rogers sought to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming his trial counsel was ineffective and there was an insufficient factual basis for his guilty plea. The court denied Rogers' petition for postconviction relief. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Rogers failed to meet his burden to prove ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying Rogers' petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W.VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Norman G. Anderson, S.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Norman G. Anderson, S.J., sitting in place of McEvers, J., disqualified.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 17, 2022
2022 N.D. 50 (N.D. 2022)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark Allen Rogers, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

2022 N.D. 50 (N.D. 2022)
971 N.W.2d 853