From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Hennepin Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sep 27, 2016
Civil No. 16-cv-1981 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Sep. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Civil No. 16-cv-1981 (SRN/HB)

09-27-2016

Roosevelt Dewayne Rogers, Plaintiff, v. Hennepin County Adult Detention Center, Defendant.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2. This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. Plaintiff Roosevelt Dewayne Rogers's applications to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc Nos. 2 and 6] is DENIED.

4. Rogers's motion to amend complaint [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED AS MOOT.

5. The Clerk of Court shall provide notice of Rogers's obligation to pay the unpaid balance of the statutory filing fee to the authorities at the institution
where Rogers is confined.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: September 27, 2016

s/Susan Richard Nelson

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rogers v. Hennepin Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sep 27, 2016
Civil No. 16-cv-1981 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Sep. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Rogers v. Hennepin Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:Roosevelt Dewayne Rogers, Plaintiff, v. Hennepin County Adult Detention…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Sep 27, 2016

Citations

Civil No. 16-cv-1981 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Sep. 27, 2016)