From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Fort Myers Police Dep't

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 9, 2022
2:22-cv-81-JES-NPM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-81-JES-NPM

03-09-2022

DELMUS ANTAWN ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. FORT MYERS POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMIRA D. FOX, TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE, and PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, Defendants.


ORDER

NICHOLAS P. MIZELL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Delmus Antawn Rogers has filed, without the assistance of counsel, a civil rights complaint against the Fort Myers and Tallahassee police departments, the State Attorney for the Twentieth Circuit of Florida, and a state public defender's office. (Doc. 1). The complaint is accompanied by a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, permission to prosecute this action without paying a filing fee. (Doc. 2). In the interim, and for no readily apparent purpose, Rogers has presented the clerk voluminous and duplicative sets of documents for filing.

In the interest of maintaining a manageable docket, and until Rogers either pays the filing fee or is granted IFP status, the CLERK is directed to refuse for filing any submission from Rogers in this matter other than the court-issued forms cited in the Civil Action Order (Doc. 4)-WITHOUT ANY ATTACHMENTS-or a notice of appearance by counsel.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Fort Myers Police Dep't

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 9, 2022
2:22-cv-81-JES-NPM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Rogers v. Fort Myers Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:DELMUS ANTAWN ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. FORT MYERS POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMIRA D…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-81-JES-NPM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2022)