From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Denecke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jul 19, 2012
Case No. CIV-12-373-R (W.D. Okla. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-12-373-R

07-19-2012

DEMETRIUS TOMAZ ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND E. DENECKE, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered June 26, 2012 [Doc. No. 10] and Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation filed July 16, 2012 [Doc. No. 11]. Also before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion to Summons Defendant(s)" [Doc. No. 12]. The Court reviews the Report and Recommendation de novo in light of Plaintiff's objection.

Plaintiff argues that Defendant, a public defender acting as Plaintiff's lawyer at the time in question, was acting under color of state law. Plaintiff is wrong. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509, 521 (1981); Thomas v. Dona Ana County District Attorney, 361 Fed. Appx. 965, 967 (10th Cir. 2010).

In accordance with the foregoing, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim is DISMISSED and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claim. Plaintiff's "Motion to Summons Defendant(s)" [Doc. No. 12] is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2012.

_________________

DAVID L. RUSSELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rogers v. Denecke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jul 19, 2012
Case No. CIV-12-373-R (W.D. Okla. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Rogers v. Denecke

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS TOMAZ ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND E. DENECKE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. CIV-12-373-R (W.D. Okla. Jul. 19, 2012)