From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Buchanan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 30, 2015
No. 3:12-CV-2458-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2015)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CV-2458-M-BN

09-30-2015

FLOYD ROGERS, III, Plaintiff, v. SGT. AMIE BUCHANAN, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Defendants. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2015.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Rogers v. Buchanan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 30, 2015
No. 3:12-CV-2458-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Rogers v. Buchanan

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD ROGERS, III, Plaintiff, v. SGT. AMIE BUCHANAN, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

No. 3:12-CV-2458-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2015)

Citing Cases

Credit v. Altus Hospice

See generally Taylor, 191 F.R.D. at 514 (dismissing John Doe defendants for lack of timely service);…