From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Bonta

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 10, 2023
2:22-cv-0314-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0314-TLN-KJN

05-10-2023

KIM EDWARD ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. ROB BONTA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE

On April 12, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 32), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 32) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Bonta

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 10, 2023
2:22-cv-0314-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Rogers v. Bonta

Case Details

Full title:KIM EDWARD ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. ROB BONTA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 10, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0314-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)