From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Bomer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 9, 1920
186 P. 205 (Okla. 1920)

Opinion

No. 9653

Opinion Filed March 9, 1920.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal.

Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 (47 Okla. vi) of this court the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Nowata County; Conn Linn, Assigned Judge.

Action between Jos. R. Rogers and others and John O. Bomer and others. From the judgment, the former brings error. Dismissed.

Denton Lee and Tillotson Elliott, for plaintiffs in error.

Chase Campbell, for defendants in error.


On January 13, 1920, an order was entered, giving plaintiff in error 30 days from that date in which to file brief, and the cause was thereafter submitted on February 10, 1920. No brief having been filed within the extension of time granted, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution. Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 P. 10; McGowen et al. v. Keller Ring, 77 Oklahoma.

OWEN, C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHN. SON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY. JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Bomer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 9, 1920
186 P. 205 (Okla. 1920)
Case details for

Rogers v. Bomer

Case Details

Full title:ROGERS et. al. v. BOMER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 9, 1920

Citations

186 P. 205 (Okla. 1920)
77 Okla. 285