From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogan v. Cnty. of Lawrence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-1375 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-1375

07-02-2013

MARCIE A. ROGAN and JAMES N. RAISLEY, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Kathleen Ann Rogan, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, PENNSYLVANIA, BRIAN COVERT, Warden of the Lawrence County Correctional Facility, JOHN DOE #1, Lawrence County Correctional Facility Employee, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., JOHN DOE #2, Physician Employee, JOHN DOE #3, Medical Specialist Employee of Prime Care Medical Inc., Defendants.


District Judge Mark R. Hornak

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case is before the Court on the pending Report and Recommendation filed by Chief Magistrate Judge Lenihan on June 5, 2013, (ECF No. 26.) Judge Lenihan recommended that the Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Lawrence County and Warden Covert (ECF No. 10) be granted in part and denied without prejudice in part. The parties were served with the Report and Recommendation and informed that they had until June 24, 2013, to file written objections. No objections were filed. Therefore, after de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Lawrence County and Warden Covert (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED in part and DENIED without prejudice in part. The motion is granted as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's wrongful death (Count 7) and survival (Count 8) claims against Lawrence County and Warden Covert in his official capacity are dismissed.
(2) All Counts against all Defendants are dismissed to the extent Plaintiffs bring suit in their own right.
(3) Plaintiff Raisley's wrongful death claim asserted on behalf of his minor child is dismissed.
(4) Plaintiffs' claims against Warden Covert (Counts 7 and 8) in his official capacity are dismissed as being duplicative of the claims against Lawrence County.
(5) Plaintiffs' state-created danger claims against John Doe #1 (Count 3) and Lawrence County (Count 4) are dismissed.
(6) Plaintiffs' "special relationship" claim against John Doe #1 and Lawrence County (Count 5) is dismissed.
(7) Plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages against Lawrence County and Warden Covert in his official capacity is dismissed.
The motion is denied without prejudice as to Plaintiffs' remaining claims asserted against John Doe #1 (Counts 1, 7 and 8).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated June 5, 2013 (ECF No. 26) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is remanded back to the Chief Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings.

By the Court:

___________

Mark R. Hornak

United States District Judge
cc: Counsel of Record

(Via ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Rogan v. Cnty. of Lawrence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-1375 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Rogan v. Cnty. of Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:MARCIE A. ROGAN and JAMES N. RAISLEY, Co-Administrators of the Estate of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-1375 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

PNC Equip. Fin., LLC v. Pak

When adjudicating a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), courts may consider the allegations contained in…

Mohammed v. Doe

Id. Under the Pennsylvania statute, family includes spouses, children, or parents of the deceased. 42 Pa.…