From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RODY v. WHITAKER

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Mar 26, 1931
37 S.W.2d 288 (Tex. Civ. App. 1931)

Opinion

No. 4012.

March 19, 1931. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1931.

Appeal from Van Zandt County Court; S. L. West, Judge.

Action by W. J. Rody against M. L. Whitaker. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

T. R. Yantis and A. A. Dawson, both of Canton, for appellant.

Wynne Wynne, of Wills Point, for appellee.


This is an appeal from the county court of Van Zandt county, in which the defendant recovered a judgment against the plaintiff. The case is here without a statement of fact, in the absence of which, this court will consider only such errors as are apparent of record, and in this case we find no such to exist.

However, since appellant's principal complaint is of the court's action in failing to continue the case because the plaintiff was sick and unable to be present in court when the case was tried, we will add that we know of no law which requires the plaintiff to be present when his case is tried, and since there is nothing in the record to show that the plaintiff would have testified to material facts had he been present, there was no error by the court in refusing to grant appellant's motion for a new trial based upon such assignment.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

RODY v. WHITAKER

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Mar 26, 1931
37 S.W.2d 288 (Tex. Civ. App. 1931)
Case details for

RODY v. WHITAKER

Case Details

Full title:RODY v. WHITAKER

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: Mar 26, 1931

Citations

37 S.W.2d 288 (Tex. Civ. App. 1931)

Citing Cases

Ullman Estate v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co.

There is no showing that her absence resulted to her prejudice, or that her testimony in person or by…

Turner v. Atlanta Nat. Bank

This motion is not sworn to; neither does it contain any statement as to what the testimony of Sharber would…