From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Warden FCI Lompoc

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 20, 2015
CV 14-1041-SJO (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2015)

Opinion

          Alejandro U Rodriguez, Plaintiff, Pro se, Bakersfield, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Warden FCI Lompoc

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 20, 2015
CV 14-1041-SJO (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Warden FCI Lompoc

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN FCI LOMPOC, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 20, 2015

Citations

CV 14-1041-SJO (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2015)