From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Valley Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 2000
273 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 2000.

July 26, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered February 17, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, inter alia, is in favor of the defendants and against them, dismissing the complaint.

Sanders, Sanders, Block Woycik (Seligson, Rothman Rothman, New York, N.Y. [Martin S. Rothman, E. David Woycik, and Alyne I. Diamond] of counsel), for appellants.

Peter T. Connor, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent Valley Transit, Inc.

Jacobson Schwartz, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Robert M. Bridges of counsel), for respondent Michael Sumler.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, but was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129). The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Valley Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 2000
273 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Valley Transit, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALLISON RODRIGUEZ, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. VALLEY TRANSIT, INC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 26, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 355