Rodriguez v. Tilton

Full title: LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 30, 2013

2:08-cv-1028 GEB AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)

Opinion

LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants. No. 2:08-cv-1028 GEB AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 30, 2013

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Senior District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On April 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2013, are adopted in full; and

         2. Defendant Anthony's October 23, 2012 motion for summary judgment is granted.