From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 17, 2010
47 So. 3d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3D09-1177.

November 17, 2010.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler-Mendez, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Amy Weber and Michael T. Davis, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Rolando A. Soler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and WELLS, JJ.


Manuel Rodriguez appeals from a written sentence which does not comport with the trial court's oral pronouncement at sentencing. We reverse.

It is well settled that when a conflict arises between a written sentence and the trial court's oral pronouncement of the sentence, the oral pronouncement prevails. Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 2003). Here, the written sentence reflects that the trial court sentenced Rodriguez as a habitual felony offender. During sentencing, however, the trial court specifically stated that it was imposing a sentence within the guidelines. Thus, the written sentence does not comport with the trial court's oral pronouncement.

Accordingly, we reverse the sentence entered below and remand for the trial court to sentence Rodriguez to a guidelines sentence.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 17, 2010
47 So. 3d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 17, 2010

Citations

47 So. 3d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)