From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 18, 2022
336 So. 3d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-409

03-18-2022

Maryann Houde RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

WALLIS, J. In this Anders appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence, but we remand for an amended order of probation which strikes drug offender probation and reflects the trial court's pronouncement of probation. See Evans v. State, 257 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (citing King v. State, 201 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener's errors.

EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 18, 2022
336 So. 3d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Maryann Houde RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

336 So. 3d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)