From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 11, 2017
232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2D16–3180

10-11-2017

Gerald RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Rodriguez appeals from the judgment and sentence entered following the revocation of probation for the 2012 count of manufacturing marijuana, for which the trial court originally accepted his plea and withheld adjudication while he served the probationary sentence. We affirm the revocation and the judgment and sentence that were entered without further comment, but because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Rodriguez admitted violating, we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Huggins v. State, 216 So.3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 11, 2017
232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gerald RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Clifton v. State

However, because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Mr. Clifton admitted…