From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 10, 2013
NO. 14-13-00148-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 10, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00148-CR

2013-10-10

DIANA E. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 10, 2013.

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 05-DCR-043094


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to theft, a state jail felony offense. On March 24, 2006, pursuant to an agreement with the State, the trial court deferred a finding of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for four years. On July 26, 2011, appellant filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking to set aside the plea. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.072. On February 4, 2013, the trial court signed an order denying the requested relief, and appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

No brief was filed in this appeal. On September 9, 2013, this court ordered a hearing to determine why appellant's counsel had not filed a brief. On September 19, 2013, the trial court conducted the hearing, and a record of the hearing was filed in this court on September 26, 2013. At the hearing, retained counsel for appellant informed the court that appellant no longer wishes to appeal. No motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. We may consider the appeal based on the record from the hearing in the trial court, however. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Based on the record, we will treat counsel's statements to the court at the hearing as a request to dismiss the appeal without a written motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 2 (permitting the court to suspend a rule's operation to expedite a decision or for other good cause); Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 108, 110-11 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd) (applying Rule 2 to suspend Rule 42.2's requirement for a signed motion). We grant the request for dismissal.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce, and Jamison. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 10, 2013
NO. 14-13-00148-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:DIANA E. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 10, 2013

Citations

NO. 14-13-00148-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 10, 2013)