From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Aug 29, 2012
No. 3D12-758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D12-758 Lower Tribunal No. 94-25867

08-29-2012

Pedro Rodriguez, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Pedro Rodriguez, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Darrin P. Gayles, Judge.

Pedro Rodriguez, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Among other things, the appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion complains that his 1996 sentencing order erroneously reflects that he was sentenced to life as an habitual felony offender on counts two and three of the information at a time when section 775.084, Florida Statutes, did not provide for enhanced sentences for life felonies such as the ones alleged in those two counts. Because the oral pronouncement of sentence reflects that he actually was not sentenced as an habitual felony offender on these counts, the sentencing order is hereby amended to conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement, which was in compliance with then-prevailing law. See State v. Akins, 69 So. 3d 261 (Fla. 2011). Otherwise, the order denying post conviction relief is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Aug 29, 2012
No. 3D12-758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Pedro Rodriguez, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

No. 3D12-758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2012)