From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 1, 2013
No. 63218 (Nev. Jul. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63218

07-01-2013

ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of possession of a controlled substance. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, Judge.

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that she has informed appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever waived. Having been so informed, appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.

______________________, J.

Hardesty
______________________, J.
Parraguirre
______________________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge

Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

Alejandro Rodriguez


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 1, 2013
No. 63218 (Nev. Jul. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 1, 2013

Citations

No. 63218 (Nev. Jul. 1, 2013)