From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 23, 2005
915 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D05-860.

November 23, 2005. Rehearing Denied December 23, 2005.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Judge.

Eric Rodriguez, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Olga L. Villa, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's order denying the defendant's motion to clarify sentence. The trial court properly sentenced the defendant to a ten-year minimum mandatory sentence under section 775.087(2)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (1999). The State concedes, however, that the written order improperly shows the defendant was sentenced to the ten-year minimum mandatory sentence under the habitual offender statute. Therefore, we remand to the trial court with directions to correct the ministerial error in the written sentence, in accordance with the oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of sentencing order.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 23, 2005
915 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 23, 2005

Citations

915 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)