From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Saul

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 24, 2021
19 Civ. 4925 (AT) (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2021)

Opinion

19 Civ. 4925 (AT) (SN)

08-24-2021

SANDRA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

On August 13, 2021, Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court's order of May 15, 2020. ECF No. 42. The same motion was docketed again on August 17, 2021. ECF No. 43. The motion is DENIED as untimely. See Local Rule 6.3 (requiring motions for reconsideration to be served within fourteen days of the Court's original determination). Even if it were timely, Plaintiff's arguments are meritless and fail to meet the high bar required to prevail on a motion for reconsideration. Mallet v. Miller, 438 F.Supp.2d 276, 277 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Saul

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 24, 2021
19 Civ. 4925 (AT) (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 24, 2021

Citations

19 Civ. 4925 (AT) (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2021)