From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Moran Automotive & Towing, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 13, 2021
21-CV-2529 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-2529 (JPO)

07-13-2021

JULIO H. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. MORAN AUTOMOTIVE AND TOWING, INC., et al., Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge

Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on April 9, 2021. (Dkt. No. 8.) The docket does not indicate that Plaintiff has served Defendant Moran Automotive and Towing, Inc. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a defendant to be served with the summons and complaint within ninety days after the complaint is filed.

Plaintiff is directed to advise the Court in writing why he has failed to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant within the ninety-day period, or, if Defendant has been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If no written communication is received by July 27, 2021, showing good cause why such service was not made within ninety days, the Court will dismiss the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Moran Automotive & Towing, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 13, 2021
21-CV-2529 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Moran Automotive & Towing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIO H. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. MORAN AUTOMOTIVE AND TOWING, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 13, 2021

Citations

21-CV-2529 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2021)