From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Masters

United States District Court, D. Guam, Territory of Guam
Mar 12, 2003
CIVIL CASE NO. 02-00033 (D. Guam Mar. 12, 2003)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 02-00033.

March 12, 2003

DANIEL S. SOMERFLECK, Attorney for Plaintiff.

FREDERICK A. BLACK, United States Attorney, MIKEL W. SCHWAB, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Hagatna, Guam, Attorneys for the United States of America.


AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER


Pursuant to Rules 16 and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 16.1 for the District Court of Guam, the parties hereby submit the following First Amended Scheduling Order.

The Scheduling is Amended to reflect a more serious reflection on the potential for the case to go beyond disposition by motion.

At the hearing of March 3, 2002, the Court correctly pointed out that the United States had assumed the matter would be quickly settled and had not put the appropriate and necessary detail into a Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan, reflecting all possible discovery and trial. Changed dates are indicated in bold for easy reference.

This Amended Scheduling adds approximately 120 days to the scheduled trial date and extends the other schedule points accordingly.

1. The nature of the case is as follows:

Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under 7 G.C.A. 20302, alleging that the Defendant has intentionally caused injury to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff is in fear of imminent injury.

Defendant denies the substantive fear of imminent injury and challenges the appropriateness of seeking a restraining order in the context of a labor dispute between a federal employee and her federal supervisor where the contact is limited solely to the federal employment on an exclusively federal enclave (Andersen Air Force Base).

2. The posture of the case is as follows:

a.) The following motions are on file:

1. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Order to Show Cause

b.) The following motions have been resolved:

1. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Show Cause.

2. Defendant's Application for Writ of Certiorari (removal to Federal Court).

c.) The following discovery has been initiated:

Defendant has disclosed documents relevant to the ongoing employment dispute between the plaintiff and the DODEA school system.

3. All motions to add parties and claims shall be filed on or before: Friday, March 21, 2003.

4. All motions to amend pleadings shall be filed on or before Friday, March 21, 2003.

5. Status of Discovery:

The Discovery Plan attached hereto is adopted and incorporated as part of this First Amended Scheduling Order.

6. The parties appeared before the Court for the scheduling conference on March 3, 2003, at which time the Court pointed out the deficiencies in the scheduling order and the lack of a sufficiently detailed discovery plan, thus leading to this filing.

7. The discovery cut-off date is Monday, April 28, 2003.

8. a.) The anticipated discovery motions are: None at this time.

All discovery motions shall be filed on or before Monday, May 5, 2003, and heard on or before Friday, May 30, 2003.

b.) The anticipated dispositive motions are:

The United States anticipates the possible filing of a motion for dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment based on the absence of a factual basis for the restraining order; the preemption of civil service, base security, federal teacher's union, EEOC and other remedies; the supremacy clause provisions of policing activities on a U.S. military base, and the lack of jurisdiction for domestic restraining orders in the context of an employment dispute on a federal enclave.

All dispositive motions shall be filed on or before Monday, June 30, 2003 and heard on or before Friday, August 1, 2003.

9. The prospects for settlement are:

Plaintiff's Position: No prospect of settlement is foreseen at this time United States' Position: The
United States believes the issues will be resolved by dispositive motion.

10. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference shall be held on the 21st day of October, 2003, at 3:30 p.m . (no later than 21 days prior to trial date) (time to be set by the Court).

11. The parties' pretrial materials, discovery material, witness lists, designations and exhibit lists shall be filed on or before Monday, October 27, 2003. (no later than fourteen (14) days prior to trial).

12. The Proposed Pre-Trial Order shall be filed on or before the 3rd day of November 2003. (seven days prior to trial).

13. The Final Pre-Trial Conference shall be held on the 5th day of November, 2003, at 3:30 p.m. (7 days prior to trial) (time to be set by the Court).

14. The trial shall be held on Wednesday the 12th day of November, 2003, at 9:30 a.m.

15. The trial is not a jury trial (it is an application for a restraining order).

16. It is anticipated that is will take one day to try this case.

17. The names of counsel in this case are:

DANIEL S. SOMERFLECK, Director Guam Legal Services (*Pending approval for withdrawal from case)
MIKEL W. SCHWAB Assistant United States Attorney

18. The Plaintiff and Defendant do wish to submit this case to a settlement conference.

19. The parties present the following suggestions for shortening trial: NONE.

20. The following issues will also affect the status or management of this case: NONE


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Masters

United States District Court, D. Guam, Territory of Guam
Mar 12, 2003
CIVIL CASE NO. 02-00033 (D. Guam Mar. 12, 2003)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Masters

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN KATHERINE RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, vs. JOSEPH E. MASTERS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Guam, Territory of Guam

Date published: Mar 12, 2003

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 02-00033 (D. Guam Mar. 12, 2003)