From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Macy's W. Stores, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2022
CV 21-364-DMG (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-364-DMG (GJSx)

09-23-2022

Bertha Rodriguez v. Macy's West Stores, Inc., et al.


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE A JOINT STATUS REPORT

The parties were required to file a Joint Status Report regarding the outcome of the arbitration in this matter by May 14, 2022. [See Doc. ## 11 (ordering parties to file a joint status report within 10 days after issuance of an arbitration ruling), 12 (Defendant's status report stating the Arbitrator issued a final award on May 4, 2022).] The parties failed to do so, instead filing unilateral status reports on September 8, 2022. [See Doc. ## 12, 13.] The parties are therefore ORDERED to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to file a joint status report by the due date.

The Court has nevertheless reviewed the parties' unilateral status reports. By no later than October 3, 2022, the parties shall file a joint status report regarding whether the Court should lift the stay to permit Defendant to file a motion to confirm the arbitration award and to permit Plaintiff to amend her Complaint to assert a claim for breach of contract, which may then be arbitrated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Macy's W. Stores, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 23, 2022
CV 21-364-DMG (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Macy's W. Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Bertha Rodriguez v. Macy's West Stores, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2022

Citations

CV 21-364-DMG (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2022)