From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Henry

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 24, 2023
2:20-cv-01659-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01659-DAD-DMC-P

07-24-2023

JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. D. HENRY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants Crume and Henry (Defendants) move to modify the scheduling order and extend the dispositive-motion deadline by ninety days.

Good cause appearing based on counsel's declaration indicating that Defendants have still not received discovery responses from Plaintiff as ordered by the Court on May 5, 2023, and Defendants having not received any response from Plaintiff to defense counsel's requests to schedule Plaintiff's deposition, Defendants' motion will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants' motion to modify the schedule for this case, ECF No. 41, is GRANTED.

2. Dispositive motions are due by November 1, 2023.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Henry

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 24, 2023
2:20-cv-01659-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. D. HENRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 24, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-01659-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2023)