From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hosp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 6, 2023
23-cv-00295-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00295-WHO (PR)

04-06-2023

JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL Dkt. No. 6

WILLIAMH. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Jose Antonio Rodriguez was ordered to file an amended petition because his original petition lacked all significant information, such as where and when Rodriguez was convicted; the length of his sentence; what crimes he was convicted of; and what his claims for relief are. (Order Dismissing Petition, Dkt. No. 4 at 1.) Most of the form was entirely blank. (Id.)

The amended petition likewise lacks all significant information and is largely blank. (Dkt. No. 5.) Accordingly, this federal habeas action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with my Order and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Rodriguez may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) contain an amended petition that has been properly completed.

Rodriguez's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED as moot because I granted his prior IFP application. (Dkt. No. 6; Dkt. No. 4 at 2.)

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hosp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 6, 2023
23-cv-00295-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 6, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00295-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2023)