From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Clark

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 17, 2010
EDCV 09-2261-VAP(RC) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2010)

Opinion


IVAN EDDIE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, WARDEN, Respondent. No. EDCV 09-2261-VAP(RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 17, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

         IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the action with prejudice.

         This Court also finds that an appeal would not taken in good faith, and that petitioner has not made a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 483, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Mayfield v. Calderon , 229 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir. 2000).

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Judgment by the United States mail on petitioner.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Clark

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 17, 2010
EDCV 09-2261-VAP(RC) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:IVAN EDDIE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 17, 2010

Citations

EDCV 09-2261-VAP(RC) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2010)