From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jan 25, 2022
No. 2022-60826 (N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2022-60826 Motion 2021-04052 2021-04359

01-25-2022

Angela S. Rodriguez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of New York, Defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., and Consolidated Edison, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Nico Asphalt Paving Inc. and Triumph Construction Corp., Defendants-Respondents. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Triumph Construction Corp. and Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Index No. 109051/10 No. 2021-00370


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

PRESENT: Hon. Dianne T. Renwick David Friedman Anil C. Singh Peter H. Moulton Julio Rodriguez III, Justice Presiding, Justices.

Appeals having been taken to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about November 17, 2020,

And defendant/third party plaintiff-appellant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., having moved for an extension of time in which to perfect its appeal (M-2021-04052),

And plaintiff-appellant having moved for an extension of time in which to perfect her appeal (M-2021-04359), Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motions are granted and the time in which to perfect the appeals is extended to the June 2022 Term of this Court.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jan 25, 2022
No. 2022-60826 (N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Angela S. Rodriguez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of New York, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-60826 (N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 25, 2022)