Rodriguez v. Brown

Full title: Luis RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. Esteban Leslie BROWN, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 23, 2019

263 So. 3d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-288

01-23-2019

Luis RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. Esteban Leslie BROWN, Appellee.

Crabtree & Auslander, Charles M. Auslander, John G. Crabtree and Brian C. Tackenberg ; Rodriguez Law Firm, PLLC and Jorge Rodriguez (New York, NY), for appellant. Kula & Associates, P.A., Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel and William D. Mueller, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Crabtree & Auslander, Charles M. Auslander, John G. Crabtree and Brian C. Tackenberg ; Rodriguez Law Firm, PLLC and Jorge Rodriguez (New York, NY), for appellant.

Kula & Associates, P.A., Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel and William D. Mueller, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citation omitted) ("An order granting a motion to vacate a default final judgment is reviewed under a ‘gross abuse of discretion’ standard.").