From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2016
No. 1:15-cv-01754-LJO-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)

Opinion

No. 1:15-cv-01754-LJO-EPG

10-17-2016

JOSEPH D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. Nos. 9, 17, 25)

Joseph D. Rodriguez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case against Stuart Sherman (Warden of the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (SATF)) ("Defendant"), for adverse conditions of confinement and related state claims.

On December 11, 2015 and May 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed motions requesting preliminary injunctive relief seeking court orders preventing his transfer and requiring Defendant to provide him with prepacked meals. (ECF Nos. 9, 17.) Defendant opposed the motions on several grounds. (ECF Nos. 23-24.)

The Magistrate Judge recommended on September 2, 2016, that Plaintiff's motions requesting preliminary injunctive relief be denied because "Plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of this case, and the orders for transfer and relief from retaliation sought by Plaintiff would not remedy any of the claims in this case." (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff was notified that he may file written objections with the Court within 20 days after being served with the findings and recommendations. (Id.) As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 25) are ADOPTED in full, and Plaintiff's motions requesting preliminary injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 9, 17) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17 , 2016

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2016
No. 1:15-cv-01754-LJO-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2016

Citations

No. 1:15-cv-01754-LJO-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)