From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Baker

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1984
462 N.E.2d 149 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1984

Decided February 16, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILLIAM CRANGLE, J.

Patrick A. Lyons and Steven B. Prystowsky for appellants.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Pamela Seider Dolgow and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Robert M. Ginsberg for plaintiff-respondent.

Thomas V. McMahon for George Baker and others, respondents, precluded.



Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice ARNOLD L. FEIN at the Appellate Division ( 91 A.D.2d 143).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Baker

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1984
462 N.E.2d 149 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:LUZ M. RODRIGUEZ, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1984

Citations

462 N.E.2d 149 (N.Y. 1984)
462 N.E.2d 149
473 N.Y.S.2d 972

Citing Cases

Weinstock v. Jenkin Contracting Co., Inc.

Thus, once Jenkin's negligence was established, complete indemnity of the city was triggered by this…

Vezzuto v. Parr Org. Inc.

( Bussanich v 310 East 55th Street Tenants, 282 AD2d 243, 244 (1st Dept. 2001); see also, Goncalves v 515…