From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Aidvantage

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 26, 2024
23-cv-05678-SI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05678-SI

01-26-2024

DIANA MELISSA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. AIDVANTAGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE RE: DKT. NO. 5

SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge

On December 21, 2023, the Court issued a screening order in this case in which it found that plaintiff failed to plausibly plead a claim in her complaint. Dkt. No. 5. Because plaintiff is pro se, the Court gave plaintiff until January 19, 2024 to file an amended complaint addressing the identified deficiencies. The Court indicated that if plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by said date, the Court would dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Aidvantage

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 26, 2024
23-cv-05678-SI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Aidvantage

Case Details

Full title:DIANA MELISSA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. AIDVANTAGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 26, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05678-SI (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)