From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 2, 2010
CV 07-05330 GW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2010)

Opinion


JASON RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 07-05330 GW (SS). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 2, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. The Petition is DENIED and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein by United States mail on counsel for Petitioner and on counsel for Respondent.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 2, 2010
CV 07-05330 GW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:JASON RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

CV 07-05330 GW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2010)